The Simpsons has successfully predicted the future time and time again throughout its 33 seasons, but why is it so good at showing events before they happen?

During the last years, The simpsons became famous for his ability to predict the future, but how did the show manage to predict so many future events? The simpsons has been accused of being the result of everything from psychic abilities to time travel, thanks to more than a handful of episodes that managed to portray eerily specific events before they happened. The popularity of viewer speculation has led to an entire Disney+ collection dedicated to episodes that are supposed to show the future before it happens. Audiences also spent hours rewinding through The simpsons33 seasons to find more examples of weird connections, but many of them can’t adequately explain how the show has managed to do it over and over again.

VIDEO OF THE DAY

Rabbit hole viewers first gained traction following the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States, and more recently it has been speculated that The simpsons predicted the team of Tom Hanks and Biden. People were quick to point out the Season 11 episode “Bart to the Future” where Lisa says, “We inherited President Trump’s budget crisisin an episode intended to poke fun at the idea of ​​the celebrity becoming president. The Simpsons the creators even capitalized on this theory by having Bart write “Being right suckson the board the following week.


Related: The Simpsons’ Best Fox Jokes

The moments when The simpsons supposedly showed that psychic abilities are surprisingly numerous. The precision and specificity of the scenes range from footage showing Disney’s purchase of 20th Century Fox in season 10 to residents of Springfield forcing censorship of Michelangelo’s David, which (in quite a long time) has been compared to the events of 2016 when Russia had the same debate over the famous statue. Viewers have continued to speculate about time travel over the past few years – and even weeks – especially since The simpsons predicted The Matrix Resurrections; however, a few more logical explanations emerged to the surface. Below is an explanation of how The simpsons became so good at seeing into the future.


The Simpsons story of predicting the future


Bart Simpson-The Simpsons-Predicting the Future-9:11-911

While the popularity of this theory gained the most traction in 2016, viewers have since discovered other moments The simpsons predicted that it happened decades earlier. One of the most notable examples is that the show predicted 9/11. In an episode created in 1996, a brochure of New York is presented. On the brochure, the number 9 is displayed after a dollar sign. The World Trade Center can be seen in the background, making the twin towers look like they were from 9/11. It also helped make Season 9’s “New York City vs. Homer Simpson” one of the banned episodes of The simpsons, which was censored after the September 11 attacks before being brought back a few years later. Season 2, Episode 4, “Two Cars in Every Garage and Three Eyes on Every Fish” is widely recognized as the first example of a The Simpsons prediction. The 1990 episode shows Bart catching a fish that has three eyes thanks to contaminated water from the Springfield Power Plant. Although the prediction may have been a simpsonsfor the first time, it only came true years after several later predictions. In 2011, an Argentinian fisherman discovered a three-eyed fish while fishing in a reservoir near a nuclear power plant. The episode also helped fuel theories that The simpsonsThe power plant mutates the people of Springfield.


The number of presumed predictions, however, is generally not agreed upon and ranges from around 12 to 33, depending on who is interviewed. Indeed, some events are a little too vague to count in the opinions of many viewers. Episodes that tend to get written off usually include Season 5, Episode 10, “$pringfield (or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Legalized Gambling)”. In the episode, circus performers Gunter and Ernst work with a white tiger that turns against them. This is cited as a prediction for a 2003 show presented by German-American artists Siegfried and Roy in which a white tiger they were playing attacked Roy. Everything from the German origins of their names to the color of the tiger has led several viewers to call this an example of The simpsonspsychic abilities. However (as viewers hopefully learned after Netflix tiger king and its two failed sequels), tiger attacks aren’t exactly uncommon among people who work with large predators on a regular basis. Therefore, it’s hard for most people to call it a psychic prediction instead of coming to the more realistic conclusion that the show depicts a fairly inevitable event, not a one-time scenario.


This shows an interesting phenomenon. Part of the reason the show is considered so accurate is that since the popularity and really interesting coincidences of some episodes have gained traction, viewers who have combed through past episodes have tended to be very liberal with the examples they use, like with the tiger attack and another moment during the The Simpsons episode that predicted President Trump in which Lisa’s presidential outfit is very similar to Kamala Harris’ Inauguration Day wardrobe. This has led audiences who haven’t flinched over the show’s decades to take their word for it and assume that there really are dozens of specific examples.

Related: How The Simpsons Mocked Its Most Ridiculous Censorship Ratings

A study has revealed why The Simpsons are so good at predicting events


Several classes, studies and articles have focused on The simpsons and his ability to predict – however, in an article published by Mic, Daniel Chun, former co-executive producer of The Simpsons, denied this ability (via Microphone). The same article challenges Matt Zaremsky. He is an assistant professor of mathematics at the University of Albany and had a few things to say about the show. During The simpsons‘ Golden Age and the rest of the first 12 seasons averaged 8.54 jokes per minute, (via Vulture). According to a study that Zaremsky conducted after the show’s 29th season, he determined that if the show continued at the same rate, it contained around 120,000 jokes, and more than 1.2 thousand of those jokes were future predictions. .


As mentioned above, viewers generally believe that there are only 12-33 accurate predictions. However, Zaremsky’s study determined that 1,224 predictions were made. This was done before seasons 30-33, but assuming the jokes are still in, that means The simpsons has a success rate of about 1.6%. Simply put, the study shows that less than two out of 100 predictions have come true.

What This Really Means About The Simpsons’ Prediction History


Lady Gaga-The Simpsons-Predicts-Future-Psychic

There’s no denying that some episodes show events in a significant amount of detail – for example, many refer to Lady Gaga The Simpsons cameo showing his Super Bowl performance as an example of the specifics of a very similar real-life storyline. The show not only predicted his performance, but he also managed to show off a remarkably similar costume and his high-flying performance and accompanying harness. There’s also no denying that the highest estimate of 33 instances of the show’s creepy ability to see into the future would mean there’s roughly one prediction per season. Even estimates at the lower end of the spectrum seem significant, given the lack of ability other cartoons have to seemingly predict the future. However, even discounting the generosity with which some viewers determine which episodes predicted the future, if the show is broken down by each prediction creator thrown at the wall versus those who actually got stuck, it’s clear that The simpsonsThe ability to predict the future is only as accurate as the public chooses to believe.


Next: How The Simpsons Convinced People Jason Voorhees Carries A Chainsaw

Anatomy-of-a-scandal-Kate-Woodcroft-Holly-Berry-final-shot-season-1-end-final

Why The Anatomy Of A Scandal’s Final Twist Was So Controversial (And Unethical)


About the Author